--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful > Para: "BLFS Support List" > Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:43 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > Just remembered: after many *jepg* install/remove and > at the same time > > (better say at the same problem), I had two versions > of > > xulrunner/firefox-18.0.1, one with system jpeg, other > with built-in > > jpeg. So, the same version did not work for one > combination and later > > worked for the final libjpeg-turbo only.
Many that I have written and what I will write in this is from memory, so I could be wrong if my memory is betraying me. > Well one way to isolate an verify the problem would be to > have: > > lrwxrwxrwx 16 Jan 21 12:49 > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > lrwxrwxrwx 16 Jan 21 12:49 > /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 -> libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > -rwxr-xr-x 365069 Jan 21 12:49 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.2 > -rwxr-xr-x ?????? Jan 21 12:49 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.4.0 > > test This combination did not work. Also tested removing libjpeg.so.8.4.0, again, no success. > Then > > cd /usr/lib > ln -sf libjpeg.so.8.4.0 libjpeg.so > ln -sf libjpeg.so.8.4.0 libjpeg.so.8 > > test That, I did only after removing the turbo version and reinstalling the v8. It is what works now. > That should completely verify whether the jpeg version is > the problem. > > -- Bruce About the .a and .la. This is another thing I need to understand. Many discussions, here. I will probably tomorrow, move out the ones from libjpeg-turbo and test. Then will start moving out many others, perhaps all, keeping elsewhere, and test. Thanks for telling me that. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
