Le 06/12/2019 à 10:16, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev a écrit : > Le 06/12/2019 à 07:20, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev a écrit : >> >> On 12/5/19 11:44 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to test blocaled on a lfs/blfs build (SysV, of course). >>> BLFS version is 2019-12-05. >>> LFS version is SVN-20191201 >>> >>> When not applying the "link_whole" sed to dconf, some symbols appear as >>> duplicate, and the build of dconf fails. >>> When applying the sed to dconf, dconf builds, but dconf-editor fails because >>> of missing symbols, which are exactly the same as those appearing as >>> duplicate >>> in dconf when the sed is not applied. >>> >>> dconf devs have commited the sed, but nothing has happened on the >>> dconf-editor >>> side. So I think dconf-editor devs have not yet hit the snag. >>> >>> I guess that any program using the API symbols that were duplicate may be >>> broken now... Christopher has cited gnome-terminal as broken, and ISTR that >>> Doug mentioned that he had problems with gnome-terminal (not sure the >>> failures >>> are related though). >>> >>> In any case, our book is broken. So I think we should do something >>> (downgrading meson would be the easiest path). >>> >>> Pierre >> >> Hi Pierre, >> >> I just discovered that I made a typo when I originally implemented the sed. >> It >> should be "client", not "common". >> >> I've just fixed it at r22438 >> > > Ah, sorry for not checking (I looked at the upstream commits again, but didn't > notice). > > Will try, thanks
Worked as a charm, thanks again. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
