On September 10, 2019 12:36:00 PM CDT, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all > >I noticed that initd-tools is gone from BLFS and seems to have been >replaced by lsb-tools. I also noticed that BLFS bootscripts have been >updated with tons of fixes for dependency information, so thanks for >all >the work on that! > >However, I noticed that lsb-tools is implemented in python3, which of >course is no problem for the book, as python3 is needed for meson/ninja > >in lfs already. > >My own personal problem is that my lfs/blfs-based distro does contain >initd-tools in the minimal install I use for my routers, but not >python3, and I'd like to keep it that way, for size and security >reasons >(less software means less bugs). > >So, what I wanted to ask: > >In what functional way do the new python-based install_initd and >remove_initd differ from the old, c-based ones? > >Will the old ones not be able to correctly manage the new BLFS init >scrips due to missing functionality? > >And if not, what is missing from the old ones? I would then try to add >this to initd-tools, so I can still use those. > > >Bye >Tim > >-- >http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev >FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I added was $first and $last facilities, specifically for our use of bootscripts instead of inittab for display manager. --DJ -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
