On Sep 25, 2016 7:45 AM, "Tim Tassonis" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 09/25/2016 01:05 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: >> >> So, I had a need for current Flash Player, i.e., Chromium. It's a >> monster, rivaling WebKit (it actually includes it), but during the >> compile time, I did a preliminary page for Chromium (along with several >> revisions along the way). Note, I've only done minimal testing thus far >> (the page for which I needed Flash Player, the flash player version >> page, Netflix, and some of the Google Apps), but it seems to work well. >> It still needs a bit of clean up before it's BLFS book quality (contents >> and command explanations need to be added, and I need to check validity >> of i686 builds). Is there any interest in this actually being added to >> BLFS? It adds only one small dependent package (ninja, which might be >> needed by the next version of WebKit anyway), but the release cycle is >> about equivalent with Firefox (fairly frequent releases with some >> similar deps and included packages). >> >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/BLFS-Chromium/xsoft/chromium.html > > > > Sounds interesting to me, too. I currently use the binary build from google, mainly for netflix and thought netflix won't work with chromium, but if it does, I'm very interested in having it in BLFS. > > > Cheers > Tim > >> >> --DJ >> >> >
I'd use it without even thinking twice about it. No longer would need Windows. My university's laundry system runs through Flash Player. Its called LaundryView. That and Amazon Instant Video will run through chromium, so I'd install it in a heartbeat.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
