For some reason, the "Reply" button sent the answer only to Fernando, while usually, it goes to the list... So, I resend it to the list. Sorry Fernando, if you have it twice. (true answer at the end).
Le 25/05/2014 16:15, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : > Em 25-05-2014 07:53, [email protected] escreveu: >> Author: pierre >> Date: Sun May 25 03:53:19 2014 >> New Revision: 13150 >> >> Log: >> Mariadb-10.0.11. Ticket #5063. >> >> Modified: >> trunk/BOOK/general.ent >> trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml >> trunk/BOOK/server/databases/mariadb.xml >> > > ... > >> Modified: trunk/BOOK/server/databases/mariadb.xml >> ============================================================================== >> --- trunk/BOOK/server/databases/mariadb.xml Sat May 24 13:03:22 2014 >> (r13149) >> +++ trunk/BOOK/server/databases/mariadb.xml Sun May 25 03:53:19 2014 >> (r13150) > > ... > >> <seg> >> - libmysqlclient.{so,a}, libmysqlclient_r.{so,a}, >> - <!-- libmysqld.{so,a},--> and libmysqlservices.a, >> + libmysqlclient.{so,a}, >> + <!-- these are symlinks libmysqlclient_r.{so,a}, --> > > I don't understand. > > libmysqlclient.so is also a symlink but you kept it. What I understand > that either symlink, hardlink or not, .so and .a have to be listed. > Igor, included them, Bruce and I kept them. Why did remove them? Just > being symlink is not a criteria to remove them. It is like that in all > other packages in the book. If there is another reason other than that, > please write in the xml, if not, please, put them back. > >> + <!-- libmysqld.{so,a},--> libmysqlservices.a, >> and several under /usr/lib/mysql/plugin/ >> </seg> >> <seg> >> > > Please do not be upset: you are right, I should have been more explicit. But, what I wanted to tell is that the whole set of libmysqlclient_r libraries, _including_ libmysqlclient_r.so.18.0.0 are symlinks to libmysqlclient.so, and libmysqlclient_r.a is also a symlink to libmysqlclient.a. So, for me, this libmysqlclient_r series look like compatibility symlinks, not libraries. Would you agree with this comment <!-- there is no libmysqlclient_r.so.xxx shared library, nor libmysqlclient_r.a static lib, only compatibility symlinks to the corresponding "non _r" libraries --> OTOH, I do not have strong feeling about that. Another solution could be to put them back, and write that they are symlinks to the corresponding non _r versions. Please tell me. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
