Le 16/05/2014 16:29, Ken Moffat a écrit :
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:29:21AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 16-05-2014 06:40, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Em 15-05-2014 22:19, Ken Moffat escreveu:
Should we in-effect revert both these hunks, now that systemd has
fallen out of LFS ? A big Thank You to Fernando for documenting in
the log that this had changed.
ĸen
I think so. Just be safe, it would be good to build without systemd
switches. This applies to some other packages, I think. First one to
need the package could fix it, I think.
BTW, I was off line yesterday, something broken in the cable connection,
ISP support only arrived very late.
One thing: we could leave there only the command explanations, to help
people trying to build BLFS using systemd. It is something we learned,
and better stay documented. What do you think?
Yes. We already have a number of optional commands in the
explanations, a few more will not hurt.
ĸen
I see that this is an interesting thread between Ken and Fernando, but I
only receive Ken's mails.
I also have seen some quoted answers of Bruce, that I hadn't received.
Is it normal?
Regards
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
