On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:29:21AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 16-05-2014 06:40, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > > Em 15-05-2014 22:19, Ken Moffat escreveu: > > > >> Should we in-effect revert both these hunks, now that systemd has > >> fallen out of LFS ? A big Thank You to Fernando for documenting in > >> the log that this had changed. > >> > >> ĸen > >> > > > > I think so. Just be safe, it would be good to build without systemd > > switches. This applies to some other packages, I think. First one to > > need the package could fix it, I think. > > > > BTW, I was off line yesterday, something broken in the cable connection, > > ISP support only arrived very late. > > One thing: we could leave there only the command explanations, to help > people trying to build BLFS using systemd. It is something we learned, > and better stay documented. What do you think? > Yes. We already have a number of optional commands in the explanations, a few more will not hurt.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
