> On Apr 10, 2019, at 15:28 , Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is certainly not a problem with BibDesk, which just manages the
> citations, and the data is all syntactically OK.
>
> There does seem to be problem with the bibtex process, but that’s not
> BibDesk, BibDesk just runs it for the preview. I think the problem is
> somewhere in your (custom) bibtex style file (.bst), it does not seem to
> properly handle crossrefs in the article type. I cannot say what is wrong, as
> I did not see the style file.
Thanks for the suggestion, Christiaan. It pointed me in the direction of a
deep, dark, impenetrable forest with a hint of light at the far side :-}
I tried a few “standard” .bst files (like abbrv.bst and one of Nelson Beebe’s
“author date” .sty files). The first worked as expected, with no errors, and a
proper cross reference in the bibliography. The second had the same issue that
I did (the extraneous “}" at the end of the cite key).
It’s clearly not BibDesk, so I will wander off into the woods now.
Cheers,
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Director
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--------
"Weaseling out of things is what separates us from the animals.
Well, except the weasel."
- Homer J Simpson
--------
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
-----------
My wife 'n kids 'n dogs are gone,
I can't get Jesus on the phone,
But Ol' Milwaukee's Best is my best friend.
-----------
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
