No big dollar demand, I suspect. Existing off the shelf optical stuff at 10G 
satisfies most needs.  And practically speaking, for cluster interconnects 
(relevant to here) – you also want low latency, good bisection bandwidth, and a 
bunch of other stuff.  I can see a “city to city” optical link wanting 100G or 
more (although the actual fiber is awfully cheap, why not just run N slower 
fibers).


From: Scott Atchley <e.scott.atch...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 12:01 PM
To: Jim Lux <james.p....@jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: "beowulf@beowulf.org" <beowulf@beowulf.org>
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] [EXTERNAL] Re: anyone have modern interconnect metrics?

There is a lot of interest in lower-cost optics, but manufacturing costs for 
the alternatives to today's active optical cables have not provided the 
promised cost savings. Silicon photonics seems to be just a few years away just 
as fusion is just a decade away.

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:16 PM Lux, Jim (US 3370) via Beowulf 
<beowulf@beowulf.org<mailto:beowulf@beowulf.org>> wrote:
To a certain extent, faster Ethernet is more likely to be a commodity – and at 
rates above 1 Gbps, there’s substantial “art” in making a PHY that works 
reliably.   At the 10G speed, there’s things like RapidIO and SRIO, but they

  1.  Only work for short distances (<<1 meter)
  2.  Are *very* board layout and other implementation sensitive.  Fine for 
getting in and out of a package, but not great for running any distance.
Then there’s XAUI (pronounced Zowie!) which is a multiwire wire interface 
between logic and 10G (or whatever) PHY.   But it’s got the same problems as 
SRIO/RapidIO (or for that matter, the venerable (now) TLK2711 SERDES).

10G and 40G Ethernet do actually work over distances of meters, and over some 
moderate range of temperatures, and are likely to meet EMI/EMC requirements.

It is interesting that there doesn’t seem to be the same commercial pressure 
for optical versions. They all exist, but typically as modules you’d slide into 
your switch, not components you’d solder to a board.  And there are plenty of 
XAUI->optical kinds of interfaces.  And optical cables are cheap and relatively 
rugged.


From: Beowulf <beowulf-boun...@beowulf.org<mailto:beowulf-boun...@beowulf.org>> 
On Behalf Of Scott Atchley
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 7:18 AM
To: Larry Stewart <stew...@serissa.com<mailto:stew...@serissa.com>>
Cc: Mark Hahn <h...@mcmaster.ca<mailto:h...@mcmaster.ca>>; 
beowulf@beowulf.org<mailto:beowulf@beowulf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Beowulf] anyone have modern interconnect metrics?

While I was at Myricom, the founder, Chuck Seitz, used to say that there was 
Ethernet and Ethernot. He tied Myricom's fate to Ethernet's 10G PHYs.

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:08 AM Larry Stewart 
<stew...@serissa.com<mailto:stew...@serissa.com>> wrote:
I don't know what the networking technology of the future will be like, but it 
will be called Ethernet.
- unknown (to me)
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org<mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored 
by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!Ixq5D_bsl4Xvg1t1VWaYCWDx6D996js8p3ZYzDukhOAjJ13TNcEsw9PTrxQIVTKHI5LTjDrXMd4eCrVz-w_P3G62jVN8nSYT8Q$>
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to