Is NVIDIA really the only one to blame? Intel was very reluctant to support open SPMD languages (even their own ISPC), which would have delivered better performance across the whole ecosystem, to deny GPUs a foothold.
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:56 PM Ryan Novosielski <novos...@rutgers.edu> wrote: > > On May 8, 2019, at 2:42 PM, Michael Di Domenico <mdidomeni...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:14 PM Gus Correa <g...@ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote: > >> > >> Once upon a time portability, interoperabiilty, standardization, were > considered good software and hardware attributes. > >> Whatever happened to them? > > > > millennials? > > That’s a really funny way to spell NVIDIA. > > (born in ’81) > > -- > ____ > || \\UTGERS, |---------------------------*O*--------------------------- > ||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu > || \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus > || \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, Newark > `' > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Carlos S. Bederián Secretario Técnico, CCAD-UNC Profesional Principal, IFEG-CONICET Profesor Adjunto, FAMAF-UNC
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
