On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:47 PM Prentice Bisbal via Beowulf <beowulf@beowulf.org> wrote: > >>> People saying that 389-ds is slow is not encouraging, given that > >>> we're currently attempting to tune OpenLDAP to be less slow. > > i don't want to diverge this thread from the OP, but how fast does > > ldap really need to be? i have ~700 machines talking to two openldap > > servers w/ ssl enabled. we have to run nslcd on the clients, but all > > is well > Why haven't you made the switch to sssd? I was having minor OpenLDAP > performance issues years ago with RHEL 5, but when I switched to RHEL 6 > and sssd, a lot of those issues disappeared.
for the same reason we're still carrying non-fixed ethernet devices names forward and host of other oddities from the rhel6 world into rhel7... cause i'm not in charge... :) _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
