-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2018 01:44 PM, Michael Di Domenico wrote:
> i don't want to diverge this thread from the OP, but how fast does
> ldap really need to be? i have ~700 machines talking to two
> openldap servers w/ ssl enabled. we have to run nslcd on the
> clients, but all is well
It's somewhat relevant, given someone's consideration of migration.
Faster than ours! We have a single at the moment (the VM is movable so
we don't really need it for high availability), but we are having
problems with certain operations (like ls -la /home). Our case appears
as if it might be related to our VM infrastructure or some tuning
parameter that is very wrong. I've done the usual things (indexing on
uidNumber and gidNumber, etc.) but haven't had a ton of luck so far.
- --
____
|| \\UTGERS, |----------------------*O*------------------------
||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 ~*~ RBHS Campus
|| \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Res. Comp. - MSB C630, Newark
`'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEARECAAYFAlvQsPMACgkQmb+gadEcsb5jQwCg3iGt3F++BgOdAk9hmbjdsdRx
TAwAn0t2TAC2vNWr+tMe+2NIn901YYYV
=Frvx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
