As someone who works in a government funded research lab (as do many other list 
members, I suspect), there’s a lot of other factors that go into the seemingly 
bizarre funding and development stuff.  Here’s a partial list  - not specific 
to this instance, but just in general.


1)      The “name” sponsor isn’t always the one actually interested in the 
final product – money gets shuffled around via Interagency Authorizations and 
funding vehicles.  Typically a given lab will have a “prime contract” or 
“master contract” with one government agency (NASA in the case of JPL, where I 
am). All the work you do is on task orders under that master contract.  If 
someone else (e.g. DoD, DHS, DoE) wants something done by JPL, they IA or MIPR 
money to NASA, who sends it to JPL.

2)      There is a desire to keep competencies at various centers – in order to 
be an intelligent consumer, it helps to have built one – I venture to say that 
folks who are on this list (almost all of whom have at least tried to build a 
cluster) are better at buying a cluster from someone else.

3)      Political considerations – The senator from the great state of 
Ruritania takes pride in having the worlds fastest computer and jobs for all 
those STEM grad students connecting patch cords in his/her state.

4)      Workforce retention – Building the worlds fastest computer is 
interesting work – for technical people, the single factor that keeps them in 
their job, and not jumping elsewhere (assuming they’re paid some reasonable 
amount) is “I get to do interesting work”.   You may be HPC’ing for half your 
time, and doing lethally boring contract monitoring (watching Other People do 
interesting work) the other half of your time.  You don’t leap out of bed in 
the morning saying, I hope that monthly financial statement has arrived so I 
can review it.



Jim Lux
(818)354-2075 (office)
(818)395-2714 (cell)

From: Beowulf [mailto:beowulf-boun...@beowulf.org] On Behalf Of C Bergström
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 4:59 AM
To: Scott Atchley <e.scott.atch...@gmail.com>
Cc: Beowulf Mailing List <beowulf@beowulf.org>
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Intel kills Knights Hill, Xeon Phi line "being revised"

Actually, the better question is, which vendor received funds and actually made 
a useful solution that can go production with the deliverables. From my view it 
seems like history is repeating itself[1] and I wish more people would wake up. 
The top down approach to funding scientific research and the in-fighting 
between labs is just too much nonsense. If these research projects were a 
start-up, it would have failed hard.

 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X87


On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Scott Atchley 
<e.scott.atch...@gmail.com<mailto:e.scott.atch...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hmm, can you name a large processor vendor who has not accepted US government 
research funding in the last five years? See DOE's FastForward, FastForward2, 
DesignForward, DesignForward2, and now PathForward.

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Jonathan Engwall 
<engwalljonathanther...@gmail.com<mailto:engwalljonathanther...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
Maybe they felt married to government sponsorship while the competition has 
found a way to compete with itself.
http://www.nag.co.za/2017/10/26/amd-launches-ryzen-processor-with-radeon-vega-graphics-for-notebooks/
Maybe such a huge contract even looks too good to be true.

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Mikhail Kuzminsky 
<k...@free.net<mailto:k...@free.net>> wrote:

Unfortunately I did not find the english version, but Andreas

Essentially yes Xeon Phi is not continued, but a new design called Xeon-H is 
coming.
Yes, and Xeon-H has close to KNL codename - Knights Cove. May be some important 
(for HPC) microarchitecture features will remain.
But in any case stop of Xeon Phi give pluses for new NEC SX-Aurora.

Mikhail Kuzminsky

Zelinsky Institute
of Organic Chemistry
Moscow

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org<mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored 
by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org<mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored 
by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org<mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored 
by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to