Have no idea what the guy did in the referenced blog - not sure what was the 
setting, same system etc. But having higher latency with FDR versus QDR is not 
something that we see in any of the testing we did.

The slight increase in the switch latency has nothing to do with the data speed 
- but with the features set and have support for both IB and Eth on the same 
switch. 

The FDR switch latency of 170ns, was decreased to 130ns on the EDR switch (we 
already posted that info). 

 Gilad


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hahn [mailto:h...@mcmaster.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:18 PM
To: Gilad Shainer
Cc: beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] InfiniBand channel bundling?

> If you compare QDR devices to FDR devices, than FDR is showing lower 
>latency.

in the paper referenced, that is not the case.  the numbers provided are QDR 
1.27 us, versus FDR 1.67 us.  although it's only 400ns, it's still >30% slower, 
when one might expect a speed improvement.

> What you might heard is that the FDR switches are slightly higher 
>latency than the QDR switches as they include new capabilities of link 
>level retransmission and forward error correction, but overall end to 
>end latency with FDR is lower.

that's interesting - do you mean that in order to achieve higher bandwidth, the 
error rate becomes a problem, necessitating RT/FEC?  I guess it's obvious from 
the shrinkage of allowed passive/copper cable lengths that SNR/BER is a big 
issue, but does this imply that going optical will reduce the latency cost for 
FDR?

> The EDR switch latency is lower than the FDR switch and the QDR 
> switch, so further latency decrease will be seen with EDR.

I'm puzzled by this, since at least marketing latencies of existing switches 
are pretty low (170ns/hop for FDR).  how much can 170ns be improved?

thanks, mark hahn.
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to