Gilad,

If end-to-end is lower for FDR, then what latency is being measured for FDR that is higher than for QDR? According to Wikipedia, and the Mellanox website, FDR does have a better latency than QDR (0.7 microseconds vs. 1.3 microseconds), but I and others on this list have heard that FDR has worse latency than QDR. Have we been misinformed, or does it depend on how you measure or define latency?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfiniBand
http://www.mellanox.com/page/performance_infiniband

Prentice


On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Gilad Shainer wrote:
End-to-end FDR latency is lower than end-to-end QDR latency - per published 
measurments that can be found in multiple places.

Gilad

-----Original Message-----
From: Beowulf [mailto:beowulf-boun...@beowulf.org] On Behalf Of Jörg 
Saßmannshausen
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:45 PM
To: Beowulf Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] InfiniBand channel bundling?

Hi all,

thanks again for the wealth of information.

Now, given that I am not interested in transporting files over the IB network 
but I am doing parallel calculations, I would have thought that the latency 
here is more important than the speed?
Thus, if FDR has a higher latency than QDR, does that mean my performance is 
decreasing when I am running a calculation between nodes?

For those of you who are into Chemistry code: I am using VASP, cp2k, quantum 
espresso and cpmd mainly. All of that is plain wave code.

All the best from a wet London

Jörg


On Mittwoch 29 Oktober 2014 Prentice Bisbal wrote:
On 10/28/2014 04:43 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, John Hearns wrote:
Here is a very good post from Glenn Lockwood regarding FDR versus
dual-rail QDR:

http://glennklockwood.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/fdr-infiniband-vs-dual
-rail
-qdr.html
indeed, very nice.  though also quite surprising - is it known that
FDR is so terrible for latency?  seems astonishing to me.
Yes, it was known to me. I had already known that FDR was worse than
QDR for latency, but I don't remember my source. I don't know if I'd
characterize it as "so terrible", though.

--
*************************************************************
Dr. Jörg Saßmannshausen, MRSC
University College London
Department of Chemistry
Gordon Street
London
WC1H 0AJ

email: j.sassmannshau...@ucl.ac.uk
web: http://sassy.formativ.net

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

--
Prentice Bisbal
Manager of Information Technology
Rutgers Discovery Informatics Institute (RDI2)
Rutgers University
http://rdi2.rutgers.edu

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to