On 10/25/2011 07:13 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:46:49AM -0400, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > >> The systems where screen is being abused are not part of the batch >> system, and they will not /can not be for reasons I don't want to get >> into here. The problem with killing long-running programs is that there >> are often long running programs that are legitimate in my evironment. I >> can quickly scan 'ps' output and determine which is which, but I doubt >> that kind of intelligence could ever be built into a shell script. > I see that you didn't bother to check out the software proposed soon > after you asked your question. If you don't check out potential > answers because you doubt they will work, why should anyone bother to > reply to you?
Greg, I didn't realize I needed to log a detailed response to every suggestion made to me on this list. I've been a member of this list for quite sometime, and I've never seen a comment like yours before. You're out of line. People should bother to reply to me because I've been a participating member of this list for 4 years now, and often assist others when I can. I don't expect a response to every suggestion I provide to others. -- Prentice _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
