Robert G. Brown wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, John Hearns wrote:
2009/4/24 Robert G. Brown <r...@phy.duke.edu>:
I don't think memory is all that unstable, especially down where I live.
In Denver, maybe. I think you need a lot of RAM, for a long time, to
see a lot of radiation induced errors, or a source of high energy
particles.
I thought more of a motherboard of RAM chips - which were flat in
those days (mumble) years ago, and putting a radiation source directly
above them. Poor man's silicon strip detector.
I vaguely remember an article long ago where somebody opened a RAM chip
and hooked it up so that they could play with the timing refresh. RAM
is sensitive to light. They wrote an array of ones while projecting an
image onto it, waited a suitable amount of time, and could read the
image out of the memory in 1's and 0's where the light hitting the array
discharged the caps. A poor man's camera.
Hmmm, let's see. Yeah, there is even a patent somebody filed for this
(GIYF).
So this might work if you had enough flux.
Hah! Google IS your mighty friend! Google up:
Radiation Dosimetry Using Three-Dimensional Optical Random Access
Memories
Hmm, people make cheap neutron detectors out of DRAM.
So I guess this would work, but I still think you need a pretty peppy
particle. The article suggests 0.5 MeV or up.
This is the process that led to the original CMOS imaging chips. And, I
still use one for visible light astro-imaging.
gerry
--
Gerry Creager -- gerry.crea...@tamu.edu
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
