An arrangement like this just muddies the situation even further. If I
had a software problem, do I call cluster, or the 3rd-party hired to
install the software?
if you had a problem that could be clearly attributed to whoever
sold you the package, you should call them. they sold it, and if
what they sold included support, they're on the hook. of course,
they might claim you broke it, but that's always an option for a vendor
wanting to avoid support.
for us, we currently run HP's RHEL version (XC) on our HP clusters;
it includes Platform LSF. when we have problems, we open a ticket
with HP - whether they use their own inhouse expertise or punt
to Platform is up to them. same as for hardware, really.
I think you mean "buy a shrink-wrapped cluster from a well-respected,
cluster-specific vendor that has proven in-house cluster expertise"
no, I don't - what's required is a paid-for support contract
and a vendor who takes it seriously. if I bought a cluster with
support, I'd go straight to the legal dept if I thought the vendor
wasn't living up to the contract...
all vendors are, by nature and necessity, interested in avoiding
support costs. there are always hoops to jump through - mainly,
I think, to filter out the randoms. that is, enough friction to
cause you to think about reading the docs first, but also enough
layers of support to keep their heaviest tech from explaining vi ;)
regards, mark hahn.
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
