Stuart Midgley wrote:

So, to get back to the original discussion, SGI disappearing from the
landscape means one less option to choose from.

You think SGI designed the hardware for their non-shared-memory
clusters?  I don't thnk so.

-- greg


No, SGI use supermicro. But that isn't really the point. They did design their own shared memory systems and they will be sorely missed if they are not continued. We were really looking forward to a large shared memory x86 system. Hopefully it still eventuates.

Having just purchased a heap of nehalem systems from SGI, the one thing we love about them is their fleet-of-foot. I can ask SGI for a quote, they understand what I want and get back to me within a day, no stuffing around. I ask Sun/IBM/HP for the same quote, 2 weeks later, 6 or 7 phone calls, 3 visits I still don't have a quote. Once they get it in, it is, without doubt, considerably more expensive and we have usually placed a PO with SGI 2 weeks prior.

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
My experience is the polar opposite. SGI quotes took forever. And that situation goes back to the mid 90's. I can usually have a Sun quote in hours.

SGI produced some really good hw for crunching numbers. I used everything from Indy, to Origin2000's, to Origin350's. I also tried some of their initial PC hardware in 2000 or so. i was also impressed with their field Engineers. I hired one when he was laid off in 2001. But I never had a timely response oin a quote request.

Mike
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to