You're right, a lot of those 'clusters' are just theoretic clusters. Those who are number crunching wouldn't ever think of buying something else than quad cores as of now.

About some remark someone made that the c7 also supports encryption bla bla, you gotta be careful there. For fun i had installed bitlocker at a quadcore AMD numbercrunching machine, and the machine is broken now, just after a few months.

Now of course i'm gonna get a lecture of RGB about why windoze sucks even more than its blowup rate indicates and he'd be right about it then, yet my important remark here is that dropping a few things like sha1 etc is total useless, as when number crunching then encryption is a thing you want to avoid at all costs.

For ISPs who want to encrypt at tcp/ip level i bet we aren't gonna get any public info from them what their concerns is; i'd rather guess that they all go for intel mobile cpu's anyway, lower power states there definitely is important; it's only about power there.

Vincent

On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:03 PM, andrew holway wrote:

Im still not convinced, bang for buck your going to get more
clustering this junk than buying commodity hardware. Benchmarks at the
ready.

Andy

On 08/11/2007, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 09:36 AM 11/8/2007, Peter St. John wrote:
Recently, probably you noticed, Walmart began selling a $200 linux PC.

See, e.g., http://home.earthlink.net/~jimlux/beowulf/walmart.htm from 2002



(Apparently the OS is just Ubuntu 7.10 with a small xindow manager
instead of Gnome or KDE). Now Slashdot points to
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5305482907.html, the MB being sold
separately for $60 ("development board"). It has 1.5GHz CPU,
unpopulated memory (slots for 2GB), one 10/100 connection. Does this
look to y'all like fair FLOPS/$ for a kitchen project? I'm thinking 6
of them as compute nodes per 8 port router, with a bigger head node
for fileserving. (actually I'll use a spare room but you know what I
mean). An arrangement like this might be faster RAM access per core,
compared to multicore, since each core has no competition for is't own
memory, right?
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to