Donald,
I have spun up Sun x4100 dual core, dual processor to 100% processor
usage and normal HD writes and measured the actually powerusage at 267
watts. Obviously higher than normal HD usage (such as swapping) would
drive the number up, but I was very pleased with these results as well
as those of the x2200 machines.
These tests were made with CentOS 4 installed.
Mike Davis
Donald Becker wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Jon Bernard wrote:
Vendor A estimates that at peak load a compute node with two AMD 2216s,
4 GB of 667 DDR2 RAM, a hard drive, and an IB board will draw 265 watts.
Vendor B estimates that such a node will draw 450 watts.
Considering that the regular 2216 is 95W peak (the 'HE' version is about
65W), and the memory and IB card are both pretty warm, 265 watts is
unrealistic. Multiply a realistic max power by a power supply
efficiency and you'll get about 450 watts.
There is way to get that lower number: 2216HE processors, and very efficient
(93% would be exceptional, high 80s more realistic) power supplies. But
that will be significantly more expensive. Easily enough $$ that you would
know if that's what you are buying. (We use 'HE' processors, special
memory and highly-efficient power supplies in our blade systems to make
the thermals work, and system price/MIPS looks pretty bad compared to
standard 1U products.)
The chipsets and base processors are same between vendors, and the IB
cards and disks are about the same. The memory power use will vary a bit,
but you might get different numbers between the sample and shipped nodes.
The biggest variation will be the power supply efficiency. And even there
it will be vary significantly with the power draw.
We've measured between 50% and 93% efficiency. The worst are the supplies
in old generic 1U cases, which hopefully we won't see again. There is
a significant cost difference between today's low-end, low-efficiency
supplies and the better 80+% units. Doing an extra conversion e.g. to
50VDC then to the final board voltage, won't improve the
overall numbers, but will move the conversion and thermals to "behind the
curtain".
We could get into an interesting discussion about the best way to decrease
the typical power use of a cluster. The best way to do this is with
software -- laptop-style power control, and powering nodes down. But when
purchasing and installing clusters you have to design for that
long-running job that stays at the peak power draw and thermal state of
the cluster.
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
