On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Peter St. John wrote:

The one node refusing to send the doc, and the other note receiving it
anyway, cracked me the *** up! Thanks

P.S. the Google April Fool's actually got me thinking (network via
plumbing). Water conducts acoustics real well. So a free peer-to-peer
network within a city, or some counties, would be easy and require no new
infrastructure. I imagine the bandwidth would be weak and certainly there'd
be a problem getting between cities, but I don't think the water and sewer
utiltiies claim rights to the acoustic bandwidth (unlike hijacking phone
lines with stuff that would interfere with existing telephony) so all free.

Are you seriously suggesting that people should deliberately adopt a
shitty network?

 (:-o>

     rgb


On 4/1/07, Douglas Eadline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I just posted some interesting news on Cluster Monkey.

http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/192/1/


--
Doug
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf



--
Robert G. Brown                        http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567  Fax: 919-660-2525     email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to