No... "e-Science" has been co-opted by "grid" as their own.
Collaborative computational science has been around for quite some time.
Determining the appropriate degree of distributed computational
interprocess communication requires more than trivial examination of the
codes in use.
Please don't fall into the trap of thinking "e-Science" requires a tie
to the Globus Toolkit to be valid.
gerry
Mitchell Wisidagamage wrote:
is this "e-science" term more popular where you are? I don't really
hear it here (Canada, probably NA in general.) many (most) branches
of science are so dependent on computers that it seems redundant and
archaic.
"e-science" is huge here, in universities and scientific research . It's
associated with grid computing in the science area.
- how long will it transfer this 50GB blob of data?
- if I provide neurophysiology data from my lab, can I
be sued if the subjects' privacy is violated?
- do I have time to spend explaining how the data is encoded?
and
- hassle of going up the ladder to get permission from bosses
- explain the formulas and how to process the data.
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
--
Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
