required that you buy their storage. Also the licensing of GPFS was based on the quantity of storage, which I didn't like.
HP's version of Lustre (SFS) is also capacity-licensed (and I agree, it's a customer-hostile policy.)
I really don't seem many people discussing the good and bad things about the current crop of distributed/shared filesystems. Do they sign a contract saying they can disclose any information about their operation?
well, if you spend significant money on a commercial product, and are using/depending on it, it's not attractive to embarass the vendor in public.
IBM GPFS Ibrix Isilon Terrascale Netapp (Did I forget some).
Lustre/SFS and Redhat GFS, certainly. _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
