On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Gerald Coley <[email protected]> wrote: > They are identical actions. Same result. Using reset is easier than waiting > on the voltage. The desired action is after voltage. Reset gives you a > signal that is easy to use in order to complete the desired function. This > is not a "bug".
Sections 7.1 and 8.6.2 give different descriptions of what to wait for before driving IO pins, without mentioning each other. How is that not a documentation bug? > This is about DRIVING INTO these pins form external circuitry. It is not > about setting up SW to prevent damage from the condition. The processor i > sin reset and unable to do anything with the pins until after reset. > > There is no DANGER if you do either of these method. Ok, thanks. One related question: I have a switch debounce IC (MAX6818) powered from the 3V3 rail. Assuming its outputs rise together with its power, will the connected bone inputs probably be ok, or is it necessary to wait for 3V3 to be all the way up to be safe? Britton -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
