Hi Tim,
(I'm sending this mail to the public list as this may be of interest for
others,
too)
Tim Schoellhammer wrote:
> Gibt es einen Speziellen Grund das diese rpms nicht in die jeweiligen
> repositories committed werden?
(English/short: Why aren't these RPMs not part of the {Fedora, RHEL}
repositories?)
Obviously, Bacula was not important enough for Redhat to include it in their
own
repositories (RHEL, Fedora Core) that's why RHEL/CentOS do not ship them.
Fedora (Extras) is open for external contributors but I think there are some
issues which prevent inclusion of the given RPM packages (such as Fedora SPEC
file requirements, packaging concerns). The main obstacle is that nobody did
care enough to make the required changes.
However, some months ago a new effort (with newly created rpms) was started by
Andreas Thienemann and I think this will finally result in the inclusion of
bacula to Fedora Extras and very likely "Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux"
(EPEL). The bug report is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344
fs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
