Thanks Felix,
ok so i will wait :)
Thanks for the RPMs.
Felix Schwarz schrieb:
> Hi Tim,
>
> (I'm sending this mail to the public list as this may be of interest for
> others, too)
>
> Tim Schoellhammer wrote:
>> Gibt es einen Speziellen Grund das diese rpms nicht in die jeweiligen
>> repositories committed werden?
>
> (English/short: Why aren't these RPMs not part of the {Fedora, RHEL}
> repositories?)
>
> Obviously, Bacula was not important enough for Redhat to include it in
> their own repositories (RHEL, Fedora Core) that's why RHEL/CentOS do not
> ship them.
>
> Fedora (Extras) is open for external contributors but I think there are
> some issues which prevent inclusion of the given RPM packages (such as
> Fedora SPEC file requirements, packaging concerns). The main obstacle is
> that nobody did care enough to make the required changes.
>
> However, some months ago a new effort (with newly created rpms) was
> started by Andreas Thienemann and I think this will finally result in
> the inclusion of bacula to Fedora Extras and very likely "Extra Packages
> for Enterprise Linux" (EPEL). The bug report is:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344
>
> fs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
