On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, at 6:52 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Hi Zack, > > Since this touches code shared between Autoconf and Automake, I'm not > checking it in yet and I'm requesting comments from both sides of the > fence. > > Well, it seems good to me in principle, FWIW. I don't think this > directly affects automake?
I doubt it, unless there's something you can put in a Makefile.am that will cause Automake::Channels::msg to be called with a user-controlled $channel argument. (On the autoconf side of the fence, m4_warn([channel], [message]) does exactly that, hence the patch.) zw
