Hi Yuval, Yuval Turgeman <yuv...@redhat.com> writes:
> Thanks for the feedback ! What you described is what we are doing > today, it does the job nicely, I just thought it would be nice to > avoid 2 calls. Honestly, both VPATH and my patch feel a little hackish > to me, and the existing way is not really that painful, I guess. Your > call, I will not be offended if this gets rejected, as I wasnt 100% > sure I should post this anyway, but since I already played with it one > night, I thought why not :) I would rather stick to a single AM_PATH_PYTHON for Python. :-) Thanks for your patch anyway. If you have other ideas regarding how Python support in Automake could be improved, feel free to share your ideas on <autom...@gnu.org> or your patches on this list. Sorry for the delay. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
