Akim Demaille wrote:
> Well, we already have [...] AC_COPYRIGHT (shouldn't it be
> AC_LICENSE btw?),
Well, maybe both: you output a copyright notice with --version, but
you include a license at the top of configure. These should be different.
> I don't feel good to see those names being used. Maybe we should use
> a sub name space? Either a new one, or CONFIG: AC_CONFIG_PACKAGE,
> AC_CONFIG_COMMENT?
or AC_HEADER_*, or AC_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_HEADER_* ?
Grmpf, maybe not :-)
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / EPITA / LRDE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
94276 Kremlin-Bic�tre cedex Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99
