Apologies for the delay, I also approve.

Kind regards,

Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: Qin Wu <[email protected]> 
Sent: 09 March 2026 23:51
To: Alice Russo <[email protected]>; Davis, Nigel <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>; Thomas.Graf 
<[email protected]>; yuchaode <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; auth48archive <[email protected]>; RFC 
Editor <[email protected]>
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9940 
<draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-23> for your review

Hi, Alice:
The latest version looks good, I approve publication of this document. Thanks.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Alice Russo [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2026年3月10日 4:16
收件人: [email protected]; Qin Wu <[email protected]>
抄送: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; yuchaode 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Mahesh 
Jethanandani <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
auth48archive <[email protected]>; RFC Editor 
<[email protected]>
主题: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9940 <draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-23> for your review

Nigel, Qin,

This is a reminder that we await word from you regarding this document's 
readiness for publication as an RFC. The files are here:

  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8mTnEiym$
 [rfc-editor[.]org]
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.pdf__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8nXKKWOg$
 [rfc-editor[.]org]
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.txt__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8pKqaSNc$
 [rfc-editor[.]org]
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.xml__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8tGlb1u7$
 [rfc-editor[.]org] (source)

Diff files of all changes from the approved Internet-Draft:
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940-diff.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8nA9Zok7$
 [rfc-editor[.]org]
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940-rfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8iQAmzbb$
 [rfc-editor[.]org] (side by side)

Diff file of AUTH48 changes only:
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940-auth48diff.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8v9OyfMb$
 [rfc-editor[.]org]
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940-auth48rfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8iOO9hqN$
 [rfc-editor[.]org] (side by side)

This page shows the AUTH48 status of your document:
  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9940__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8oWHob4K$
 [rfc-editor[.]org]

Thank you.

Alice Russo
RFC Production Center

> On Feb 23, 2026, at 6:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2026/02/23
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> 
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and 
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies 
> available as listed in the FAQ 
> (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8hqsCLRr$
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]).
> 
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties 
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing 
> your approval.
> 
> Planning your review
> ---------------------
> 
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
> 
> *  RFC Editor questions
> 
>   Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor 
>   that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as 
>   follows:
> 
>   <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> 
>   These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
> 
>   Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your 
>   coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you 
>   agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> 
> *  Content
> 
>   Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot 
>   change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>   - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>   - contact information
>   - references
> 
> *  Copyright notices and legends
> 
>   Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>   RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions 
>   (TLP – 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8u-mAiZ9$
>  [trustee[.]ietf[.]org]).
> 
> *  Semantic markup
> 
>   Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of  
>   content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode> 
>   and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at 
>   
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8g-n48CK$
>  [authors[.]ietf[.]org]>.
> 
> *  Formatted output
> 
>   Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the 
>   formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is 
>   reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting 
>   limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> 
> 
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
> 
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all 
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
> include:
> 
>   *  your coauthors
> 
>   *  [email protected] (the RPC team)
> 
>   *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., 
>      IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the 
>      responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> 
>   *  [email protected], which is a new archival mailing list 
>      to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion 
>      list:
> 
>     *  More info:
>        
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf
> -announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxI__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQ
> whil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8l7jdHxB$ 
> [mailarchive[.]ietf[.]org] Ae6P8O4Zc
> 
>     *  The archive itself:
>        
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/a
> uth48archive/__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tp
> F4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8pC8tSCd$ [mailarchive[.]ietf[.]org]
> 
>     *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out 
>        of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>        If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you 
>        have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, 
>        [email protected] will be re-added to the CC list and 
>        its addition will be noted at the top of the message. 
> 
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> 
> An update to the provided XML file
> — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
> 
> Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
> OLD:
> old text
> 
> NEW:
> new text
> 
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit 
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> 
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that 
> seem beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion 
> of text, and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can 
> be found in the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream 
> manager.
> 
> 
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
> 
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email 
> stating that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY 
> ALL’, as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> 
> 
> Files
> -----
> 
> The files are available here:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.xml__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8tGlb1u7$
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8mTnEiym$
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940.pdf__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8nXKKWOg$
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940
> .txt__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrd
> jMQi1yIH7H_5VP8pKqaSNc$ [rfc-editor[.]org]
> 
> Diff file of the text:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940-diff.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8nA9Zok7$
>  [rfc-editor[.]org]
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940
> -rfcdiff.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tp
> F4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8iQAmzbb$ [rfc-editor[.]org] (side by
> side)
> 
> Diff of the XML: 
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9940
> -xmldiff1.html__;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-t
> pF4sm6kYrdjMQi1yIH7H_5VP8iMurvDW$ [rfc-editor[.]org]
> 
> 
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
> 
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>   
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9940_
> _;!!OSsGDw!NnGU8r5ue2JLD63kGhi1bgwF_cQtOQwhil5JoVi6zP-tpF4sm6kYrdjMQi1
> yIH7H_5VP8oWHob4K$ [rfc-editor[.]org]
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.  
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9940 (draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-23)
> 
> Title            : Some Key Terms for Network Fault and Problem Management
> Author(s)        : N. Davis, Ed., A. Farrel, Ed., T. Graf, Q. Wu, C. Yu
> WG Chair(s)      : Benoît Claise, Reshad Rahman
> Area Director(s) : Mohamed Boucadair, Mahesh Jethanandani
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to