Hi Rebecca,
I'm also very happy to approve it.
br
Achim
Am 04.03.26 um 19:52 schrieb Rebecca VanRheenen:
Hi authors,
This is a friendly reminder that we have yet to hear back from some of you
regarding this document’s readiness for publication.
Please review the AUTH48 status page
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9853) for further information and the
previous messages in this thread for pertinent communication.
Thank you,
Rebecca VanRheenen
RFC Production Center
On Feb 24, 2026, at 11:16 AM, Rebecca VanRheenen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I updated the sentence in Section 7.2 as you suggest. Thanks for catching that!
I have also marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document
(see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9853).
We will wait for any further updates and/or approval from Hannes and Achim
before moving forward in the publication process.
Best regards,
Rebecca VanRheenen
RFC Production Center
On Feb 24, 2026, at 7:09 AM, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Rebecca,
On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 at 02:12, Rebecca VanRheenen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the quick reply! All of our questions have now been addressed. We’ll
leave the current references to [RFC8446] and [RFC8447] as is.
Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make
changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further
updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will
await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the publication
process.
I have re-read the document and am happy to approve it.
The only nit I fnoud is in §7.2: "[...] when RRC in DTLS 1.2 is used",
which sounds slightly odd to my non-native ears.
Wouldn't it be more natural to say "[...] when RRC is used in DTLS 1.2"?
Anyway, not a big deal... I'll defer to your superior understanding of
the nuances of the English language :-)
cheers, t
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
