Hi Thomas, I updated the sentence in Section 7.2 as you suggest. Thanks for catching that!
I have also marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9853). We will wait for any further updates and/or approval from Hannes and Achim before moving forward in the publication process. Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Feb 24, 2026, at 7:09 AM, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rebecca, > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 at 02:12, Rebecca VanRheenen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Thanks for the quick reply! All of our questions have now been addressed. >> We’ll leave the current references to [RFC8446] and [RFC8447] as is. >> >> Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not >> make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any >> further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. >> We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the >> publication process. > > I have re-read the document and am happy to approve it. > > The only nit I fnoud is in §7.2: "[...] when RRC in DTLS 1.2 is used", > which sounds slightly odd to my non-native ears. > > Wouldn't it be more natural to say "[...] when RRC is used in DTLS 1.2"? > > Anyway, not a big deal... I'll defer to your superior understanding of > the nuances of the English language :-) > > cheers, t -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
