Thanks for your review, Eliot. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 page <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9945> and will continue with the publication process shortly.
Thanks, Sandy Ginoza RFC Production Center > On Feb 27, 2026, at 8:29 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Sandy, and RPC for your intensive and diligent effort. Approved. > Eliot > On 27.02.2026 17:23, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >> Hi Eliot, >> >> The files have been updated as described below. Please review the files >> below and let us know if any additional updates are needed or if you approve >> the RFC for publication. >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.html >> >> Diffs highlighting recent updates: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-lastdiff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> AUTH48 diffs: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> Comprehensive diffs: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> Thanks, >> Sandy Ginoza >> RFC Production Center >> >> >> >> >>> On Feb 27, 2026, at 7:59 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Sandy, >>> Thanks. I must apologize for not having used Github to communicate the >>> following. However... >>> I cauht two instances of inconsistency between "moderator team" and >>> "moderation team". I believe the correct term is "moderator team", and so I >>> propose the following changes: >>> Section 3, under "Administrators" (second bullet, last sentence): >>> OLD: >>> amend or rescind actions, including those taken by members of the >>> moderation team after they have >>> NEW: >>> amend or rescind actions, including those taken by members of the moderator >>> team after they have >>> Section 6, point 3: >>> OLD: >>> be immediately reported to the affected person and to the moderation team, >>> and periodically reported to >>> NEW: >>> be immediately reported to the affected person and to the moderator team, >>> and periodically reported to >>> Thanks, >>> Eliot >>> >>> On 27.02.2026 16:21, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Lars and Eliot, >>>> >>>> We have updated the document and posted the files here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.xml >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.html >>>> >>>> Diffs highlighting the most recent change only: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-lastdiff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>> >>>> AUTH48 diffs: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> Comprehensive diffs: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>> >>>> Lars, we have noted your approval on the AUTH48 page >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9945>. >>>> >>>> Eliot, please let us know if any further updates are needed or if you >>>> approve the RFC for publication. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Sandy Ginoza >>>> RFC Production Center >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Feb 26, 2026, at 11:06 PM, Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm fine with reverting to "replaces". All good otherwise! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 27, 2026, at 08:08, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not agree with Lars’ change. The term “replaces” is what was >>>>>> agreed, and the mechanisms are separate and distinct. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eliot >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27 Feb 2026, at 01:10, Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Eliot and Lars, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please note that we merged the updates and converted the markdown to >>>>>>> xml and made additional formatting updates (i.e., moved the >>>>>>> acknowledgements section and capitalized BCP in the doc header). The >>>>>>> files are available for review here: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.xml >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.txt >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.pdf >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These updates highlight all of the changes made during AUTH48: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48diff.html >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by >>>>>>> side) >>>>>>> Note: We moved the Acknowledgements in the file that initiated AUTH48 >>>>>>> (as well as the current file) so you can easily see the changes in that >>>>>>> section. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Comprehensive diffs: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-diff.html >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Eliot, in particular, please be aware this change made based on a >>>>>>> suggestion from Lars: >>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/pull/1/changes/3732420830438154b02a78a9099c968d7f20107d >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed or if >>>>>>> you approve the RFC for publication. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza >>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 4:37 PM, Sandy Ginoza >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Eliot, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your quick replies! I have updated the RPC-edits branch to >>>>>>>> include all of the updates and closed out the issues that have been >>>>>>>> addressed. Please see the updates and replies to comments in the file >>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/pull/1/changes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please let us know if any further updates are needed. If none, please >>>>>>>> indicate that the markdown is ready to be converted to XML on this >>>>>>>> issue: >>>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/issues/17 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza >>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Sandy, >>>>>>>>> I've done so now. >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Eliot >>>>>>>>> On 25.02.2026 20:19, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Eliot and Lars, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reviewing the diff! Please note that there are open >>>>>>>>>> issues as well - see >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/issues. To address the >>>>>>>>>> issues, please reply within the issue, use suggestions in the >>>>>>>>>> RPC-edits branch, or submit a new PR against the RPC-edits branch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> Sandy Ginoza >>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 2:58 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Both Lars and I have done our review on Github. There are three >>>>>>>>>>> proposed edits (one from Lars and two from me), but otherwise >>>>>>>>>>> please note my approval. >>>>>>>>>>> Eliot >>>>>>>>>>> On 25.02.2026 00:45, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please disregard the previous message; it contained incorrect >>>>>>>>>>>> links. This message contains the correct links to the repo and >>>>>>>>>>>> README for this document. See below. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *****IMPORTANT***** >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Updated 2025/12/23 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Author(s): >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The document was edited in kramdown-rfc as part of the RPC pilot >>>>>>>>>>>> test (see >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_kramdown_rfc). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> AUTH48 is being handled in GitHub as part of the GitHub pilot test >>>>>>>>>>>> (see >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=rpc-github-phase-0-pilot-test). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your document is available for review at:\\ >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please see the README for details on the AUTH48 process:\\ >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/blob/Approved/README.md >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once the content of the .md file is stable, we will convert it to >>>>>>>>>>>> .xml >>>>>>>>>>>> and provide the .html, .pdf, .txt, and .xml files for review. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You and your coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties >>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing >>>>>>>>>>>> your approval. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once the document has been reviewed and approved by all of the >>>>>>>>>>>> authors, >>>>>>>>>>>> it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>> available, there are several remedies available as listed in the >>>>>>>>>>>> FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your cooperation, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc> >>> >> >> > <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc> -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
