I'm fine with reverting to "replaces". All good otherwise! > On Feb 27, 2026, at 08:08, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do not agree with Lars’ change. The term “replaces” is what was agreed, and > the mechanisms are separate and distinct. > > Eliot > >> On 27 Feb 2026, at 01:10, Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Eliot and Lars, >> >> Please note that we merged the updates and converted the markdown to xml and >> made additional formatting updates (i.e., moved the acknowledgements section >> and capitalized BCP in the doc header). The files are available for review >> here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945.html >> >> These updates highlight all of the changes made during AUTH48: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> Note: We moved the Acknowledgements in the file that initiated AUTH48 (as >> well as the current file) so you can easily see the changes in that section. >> >> >> Comprehensive diffs: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9945-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> >> Eliot, in particular, please be aware this change made based on a suggestion >> from Lars: >> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/pull/1/changes/3732420830438154b02a78a9099c968d7f20107d >> >> >> Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed or if you >> approve the RFC for publication. >> >> Thank you, >> Sandy Ginoza >> RFC Production Center >> >> >> >>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 4:37 PM, Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eliot, >>> >>> Thanks for your quick replies! I have updated the RPC-edits branch to >>> include all of the updates and closed out the issues that have been >>> addressed. Please see the updates and replies to comments in the file here: >>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/pull/1/changes >>> >>> Please let us know if any further updates are needed. If none, please >>> indicate that the markdown is ready to be converted to XML on this issue: >>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/issues/17 >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Sandy Ginoza >>> RFC Production Center >>> >>> >>> >>>>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 11:32 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Sandy, >>>> I've done so now. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eliot >>>> On 25.02.2026 20:19, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >>>>> Hi Eliot and Lars, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for reviewing the diff! Please note that there are open issues as >>>>> well - see https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/issues. To >>>>> address the issues, please reply within the issue, use suggestions in the >>>>> RPC-edits branch, or submit a new PR against the RPC-edits branch. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Sandy Ginoza >>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 25, 2026, at 2:58 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Both Lars and I have done our review on Github. There are three proposed >>>>>> edits (one from Lars and two from me), but otherwise please note my >>>>>> approval. >>>>>> Eliot >>>>>> On 25.02.2026 00:45, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please disregard the previous message; it contained incorrect links. >>>>>>> This message contains the correct links to the repo and README for this >>>>>>> document. See below. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *****IMPORTANT***** >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Updated 2025/12/23 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RFC Author(s): >>>>>>> -------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The document was edited in kramdown-rfc as part of the RPC pilot test >>>>>>> (see >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_kramdown_rfc). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AUTH48 is being handled in GitHub as part of the GitHub pilot test (see >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=rpc-github-phase-0-pilot-test). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your document is available for review at:\\ >>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please see the README for details on the AUTH48 process:\\ >>>>>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9945/blob/Approved/README.md >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once the content of the .md file is stable, we will convert it to .xml >>>>>>> and provide the .html, .pdf, .txt, and .xml files for review. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You and your coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties >>>>>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing >>>>>>> your approval. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once the document has been reviewed and approved by all of the authors, >>>>>>> it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer >>>>>>> available, there are several remedies available as listed in the >>>>>>> FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for your cooperation, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RFC Editor >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc> >>> >> >> >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
