Tony, Thanks for your reply. All reapprovals have been received. We will continue with the publicaiton process at this time.
Thank you. Alice Russo RFC Production Center > On Feb 20, 2026, at 5:34 AM, HANSEN, TONY L <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sigh. I did reply to this, but sent it just to Phong. Sorry about that. > > I approve the latest version. > > Tony > > From: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, February 13, 2026 at 9:48 PM > To: Alice Russo <[email protected]> > Cc: Phong Vo <[email protected]>, HANSEN, TONY L <[email protected]>, Landon Curt > Noll <[email protected]>, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > <[email protected]>, Karen Moore <[email protected]>, Paul > Wouters <[email protected]>, auth48archive > <[email protected]>, RFC Editor <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Authors - Re: draft-eastlake-fnv-35 (RFC-to-be 9923) > > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside AT&T. Click for additional detail. > I continue to approve the document with the latest changes. > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > [email protected] > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 7:38 PM Alice Russo <[email protected]> > wrote: > Thanks for your reply, Landon. Your reapproval has been recorded on the > AUTH48 status page (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9923). > > *** Phong, Donald, Tony, *** > > Please note that your approvals remain in place; we assume you will send mail > if you want any further changes. If we have not heard from you by 10 am > Pacific, Tuesday (17 February), we will continue with the publication process. > > Current document: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.html (and the other formats as > well; URLs below) > > Thank you. > > Alice Russo > RFC Production Center > > > On Feb 13, 2026, at 3:51 PM, Landon Curt Noll <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Hello Eliot, > > > > I approve the text as recommended by Alice Russo, and the draft as it now > > stands, including the Glenn S. Fowler acknowledgment. > > > > — Landon Noll > > > >> On Feb 13, 2026, at 14:23, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> That is fine with me if it's fine with the authors. > >> Eliot > >> On 13.02.2026 20:55, Alice Russo wrote: > >>> Eliot, > >>> > >>> Thank you for your reply. The sentence has been updated as follows. > >>> Please let us know any further updates: > >>> > >>> The authors greatly appreciate the work of Glenn S. Fowler, who was > >>> part of the team that created the FNV algorithm. > >>> > >>> In context (please refresh): > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.html#name-acknowledgements > >>> > >>> In addition, a single space has been removed from each of two lines that > >>> were too long for the line-length limitation when creating the text file. > >>> Please let us know if you prefer a different solution. They changes are > >>> visible here: > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-lastrfcdiff.html > >>> > >>> Thank you. > >>> > >>> Alice Russo > >>> RFC Production Center > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Feb 12, 2026, at 6:18 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I appreciate that we want to honor Mr. Fowler, but because he hasn't > >>>> really been involved in the development of this draft, I don't think we > >>>> can infer that he would want to be listed as an author. With that in > >>>> mind, I would like to wordsmith the text below to more clearly indicate > >>>> his contribution (e.g., he was part of the team that created the FNV > >>>> algorithm). > >>>> Eliot > >>>> On 12.02.2026 23:12, Alice Russo wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Donald, Eliot, > >>>>> > >>>>> From your replies, it sounds like the conclusion is to move G. Fowler > >>>>> from the author list to the Acknowledgements. We have done so and have > >>>>> added a sentence as follows; please let us know any further updates. > >>>>> > >>>>> Significant contributions were made by Glenn S. Fowler. > >>>>> > >>>>> Alternatively: > >>>>> Eliot, for your awareness, there exists an option where you (as stream > >>>>> manager) approve the document in place of the missing author -- and > >>>>> they remain listed as an author (i.e., their name remains in the > >>>>> document header). This is option 3 here: > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/#missingauthor > >>>>> This option might be appealing because the algorithm's name is from the > >>>>> authors' surnames, as Donald pointed out. > >>>>> > >>>>> The revised files are here (please refresh): > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.html > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.txt > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.pdf > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.xml > >>>>> > >>>>> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-diff.html > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > >>>>> > >>>>> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-auth48diff.html > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by > >>>>> side) > >>>>> > >>>>> This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version: > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-lastrfcdiff.html > >>>>> > >>>>> We will wait to hear from you again before continuing the > >>>>> publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 status of > >>>>> your document: > >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9923 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you. > >>>>> > >>>>> Alice Russo > >>>>> RFC Production Center -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
