I have read and approved this RFC. Phong On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 11:49 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <[email protected]> wrote:
> *Phong and Tony* > > We are at the tail end of this process. Because text has been changed, we > need both of you to review and approve again. *You are currently > blocking publication of this RFC.* > > Eliot > On 15.02.2026 16:40, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: > > Thanks, Landon and Don. Phong & Tony, please approve or suggest edits. > > Eliot > On 14.02.2026 03:47, Donald Eastlake wrote: > > I continue to approve the document with the latest changes. > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > [email protected] > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 7:38 PM Alice Russo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks for your reply, Landon. Your reapproval has been recorded on the >> AUTH48 status page (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9923). >> >> *** Phong, Donald, Tony, *** >> >> Please note that your approvals remain in place; we assume you will send >> mail if you want any further changes. If we have not heard from you by 10 >> am Pacific, Tuesday (17 February), we will continue with the publication >> process. >> >> Current document: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.html (and the other formats >> as well; URLs below) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Alice Russo >> RFC Production Center >> >> > On Feb 13, 2026, at 3:51 PM, Landon Curt Noll <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello Eliot, >> > >> > I approve the text as recommended by Alice Russo, and the draft as it >> now stands, including the Glenn S. Fowler acknowledgment. >> > >> > — Landon Noll >> > >> >> On Feb 13, 2026, at 14:23, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> That is fine with me if it's fine with the authors. >> >> Eliot >> >> On 13.02.2026 20:55, Alice Russo wrote: >> >>> Eliot, >> >>> >> >>> Thank you for your reply. The sentence has been updated as follows. >> Please let us know any further updates: >> >>> >> >>> The authors greatly appreciate the work of Glenn S. Fowler, who was >> >>> part of the team that created the FNV algorithm. >> >>> >> >>> In context (please refresh): >> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.html#name-acknowledgements >> >>> >> >>> In addition, a single space has been removed from each of two lines >> that were too long for the line-length limitation when creating the text >> file. Please let us know if you prefer a different solution. They changes >> are visible here: >> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-lastrfcdiff.html >> >>> >> >>> Thank you. >> >>> >> >>> Alice Russo >> >>> RFC Production Center >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Feb 12, 2026, at 6:18 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot >> Lear) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I appreciate that we want to honor Mr. Fowler, but because he hasn't >> really been involved in the development of this draft, I don't think we can >> infer that he would want to be listed as an author. With that in mind, I >> would like to wordsmith the text below to more clearly indicate his >> contribution (e.g., he was part of the team that created the FNV algorithm). >> >>>> Eliot >> >>>> On 12.02.2026 23:12, Alice Russo wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Donald, Eliot, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> From your replies, it sounds like the conclusion is to move G. >> Fowler from the author list to the Acknowledgements. We have done so and >> have added a sentence as follows; please let us know any further updates. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Significant contributions were made by Glenn S. Fowler. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Alternatively: >> >>>>> Eliot, for your awareness, there exists an option where you (as >> stream manager) approve the document in place of the missing author -- and >> they remain listed as an author (i.e., their name remains in the document >> header). This is option 3 here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/#missingauthor >> >>>>> This option might be appealing because the algorithm's name is from >> the authors' surnames, as Donald pointed out. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The revised files are here (please refresh): >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.html >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.txt >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.pdf >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923.xml >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-diff.html >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-rfcdiff.html (side by >> side) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-auth48diff.html >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-auth48rfcdiff.html >> (side by side) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version: >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9923-lastrfcdiff.html >> >>>>> >> >>>>> We will wait to hear from you again before continuing the >> >>>>> publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 status of >> >>>>> your document: >> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9923 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thank you. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Alice Russo >> >>>>> RFC Production Center >> >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
