On 13 April 2025 23:04:29 GMT+02:00, "Bence Csókás" <benc...@sch.bme.hu> wrote:
>Hi all!
>
>On 2025. 04. 07. 9:51, notify wrote:
>> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for perl-parse-method-signatures
>> [2]:
>> 
>> Unused. EOL since 2017.
>> 
>> Dependency AUR/perl-moosex-traits is EOL since 2015,
>
>
>Don't know where you got this data from, Karen Etheridge has been committing 
>to its repo [3] all the way into July 2019.
>
>
>> and is a badly packaged orphan.
>> The latter unnecessarily makedepends on AUR/perl-test-use-ok that is
>> EOL since 2012 and is a partial predecessor duplicate of perl-test-
>> simple, carried by Arch/core/perl.
>
>
>From what you wrote, it seems all your problems stem from not this package, 
>but `perl-moosex-traits`. So instead of deleting this, why not adopt and fix 
>/that/ package instead?
>
>
>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/perl-parse-method-signatures/
>
>
>[3] https://github.com/moose/MooseX-Traits/commits/master/
>

Hi Bence,

Could you maybe adopt AUR/perl-moosex-traits and fix its packaging?

Otherwise there seem to be no other users who would use that and this library, 
and these two packages are the only remaining holdovers that are tied to the 
obsolete, badly packaged AUR/perl-test-use-ok that is EOL as a dist since 2012 
and whose later version is carried by Arch/core/perl.

I myself do not use any of these packages, that's why I opted not to adopt and 
correct perl-moosex-traits.

Please let me know of your decision on whether you want to keep and fix 
perl-moosex-traits along with keeping perl-parse-method-signatures, or if you 
choose not to adopt and adjust the former, in which case we can delete both.

Thank you in advance for your answer,

Marcell Meszaros / MarsSeed

Reply via email to