>autopsy-bin is a better package name for a package built from >binaries.
In that case, please kindly revise the AUR submission guidelines, because currently it explicitly mentions Java as an exception to the '-bin' name suffix requirement. [a] " * Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix. An exception to this is with Java. " [a]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission On 30 July 2023 15:26:43 GMT+02:00, Chih-Hsuan Yen <yan12...@archlinux.org> wrote: >Marcell Meszaros <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> 於 2023年7月30日 週日 下午6:20寫道： >> >> @yan12125, why did you reject the deletion request for this duplicate? >> >> AUR/autopsy also uses the precompiled Java bytecode as source. >> >> So the two packages are truly duplicates, the only difference is that >> autopsy-bin is 1 year older and flagged OOD for that period. >> >> On 30 July 2023 11:05:20 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> >Request #42786 has been Rejected by yan12125 [1]: >> > >> >> This is a java application so the >> >suffix '-bin' is not necessary anyway. >> > >> >Java packages can be either built from sources or binaries as well. >> > >> >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/ > >autopsy-bin is a better package name for a package built from >binaries. Therefore, orphaning and updating autospy-bin is better than >deleting autospy-bin. After that, autospy can be merged into >autospy-bin in case it is not changed to be built from sources. > >Best, > >Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125)
