Marcell Meszaros <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> 於 2023年7月30日 週日 下午6:20寫道： > > @yan12125, why did you reject the deletion request for this duplicate? > > AUR/autopsy also uses the precompiled Java bytecode as source. > > So the two packages are truly duplicates, the only difference is that > autopsy-bin is 1 year older and flagged OOD for that period. > > On 30 July 2023 11:05:20 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > >Request #42786 has been Rejected by yan12125 [1]: > > > >> This is a java application so the > >suffix '-bin' is not necessary anyway. > > > >Java packages can be either built from sources or binaries as well. > > > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/
autopsy-bin is a better package name for a package built from binaries. Therefore, orphaning and updating autospy-bin is better than deleting autospy-bin. After that, autospy can be merged into autospy-bin in case it is not changed to be built from sources. Best, Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125)
