On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:34:24PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-requests wrote: > On 6/24/21 2:23 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:06:46PM -0400, Alex Stelmachonak via > > aur-requests wrote: > >> What is wrong if this package is ARM (and RPi) specific? AUR is available > >> on > >> ArchLinuxARM and used by many people (including me). I don't think > >> "Specific > >> for ARM hardware" is a valid reason to delete package. > > > > Account has been suspended while I figure out why they are sending a > > fuckton of > > requests while not checking if they should or not. > > > Well uhhhhh funny story that: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#arch > > I know this is not listed in the rules of submission page, but it is in > the general packaging guidelines, and it's not like we haven't been > deleting packages in the past, for precisely this. The rationale being, > the *Arch* User Repository is in theory supposed to be for packages > which can be run on Arch. > > It's the same reason we delete Manjaro-specific packages.
There is a difference between Manjaro, a derivative distribution, and someone providing a port of our distribution adding PKGBUILDs to the AUR. -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
