On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 5:41 PM T.J. Townsend <blakkh...@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 03:37:31PM +0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My name is Tomaz Canabrava, Im a kde developer and mostly focus on > > Konsole. > > Other than that, I use arch Linux for the past 10 years, as my only Linux > > distro. > > > > I have experience with packaging (debian, for work) but not on arch, but > > it’s shell and that thing I can handle :) > > Hi Tomaz. When there are established, documented guidelines for how to do > something in Arch Linux, they need to be followed. With no regard for how > the application process works, with no Arch packaging experience at all, > and with an attitude like this... > Don't misunderstand practicality with attitude, I have no intention of being a pain or "that dude", you can read the rest of the e-mails I send or focus on the nitpicks, that's a choice anyone has. > > > I’ll create a gpg key when/if I need, to sign the packages, if arch Linux > > votes for me. > > > > I consider an application that does not meet the requirements and has > had > > > very little effort put in to be a waste of time. > > > > That’s true, and I guess I already have your -1 on the votes. Great > meeting > > you :) > > ...I'm not sure what kind of result you're expecting. > I was expecting an e-mail such as the one sent by Carsten Haitzler, not the one sent by Mr. Steel. When we are too strict about rules - without stating the reasons behind those rules, we will drive good people away. Mr. Steel didn't bother to search about the things I did or who I was nor did he wanted anything to know about myself or why I wanted to join Archlinux, his e-mail was basically a box-ticking-procedure-checking. That's not just how people should behave within communities, as different people behave differently and it's way more important to have an human-factor when dealing with people. > > You started off your application without any interest in doing things the > way they're always done here > ... That's correct. It's not because they are aways done that they should still be done that way, and yes, I have send an e-mail from my mobile phone without signing it from GPG. At the same time, every e-mail that I got here - even from people with the GPG key on their signature, was unsigned. > and then refused to fix that behavior when > corrected. ... That's not correct. I refused to do that *with* the reply from Mr. Steel, because I am not a robot that will do things from a list ticking all of the boxes, However, to the answer from Mr. Carsten I changed the attitude as appropriate, as he took the human approach. > Consider it a -2 now. > "Great meeting you :)" > Ignoring all the attitude on the e-mail can be hard, and you are answering the e-mail with the exact same attitude as I replied to Mr. Steel. Still, Read the rest of the thread. Tomaz
