On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 10:25 Jonathan Steel <jst...@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun 16 Jul 2023 at 15:37, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > I have experience with packaging (debian, for work) but not on arch, but > > it’s shell and that thing I can handle :) > > Why not show this by maintaining some air packages? Mostly because there is nothing in aur that I use that lacks a maintainer. But I do have a software that is not packaged yet that I can port to aur. > > This is not gpg signed and I’m sorry for that, but gian and Antonio can > > also vouch for me as the validity of this email. > > Why is it not signed? Because I don’t have a gpg key, and when the dkim features on the email already are enough to validate that the email I send is from me. > > I think you should read https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trusted_Users and > re-submit a signed application showing the minimum requirements are met. I have read the wiki and I have applied to a packager position following the wiki rules or explaining why I didn’t follow a part of it, i won’t re-apply because that’s a waste of everyone’s time just for the sake of ticking boxes. Summary: - [x] known on the opensource community with multiple, and used, programs - [x] packaging experience - [ ] aur / arch package experience - [x] contributes directly to upstream - [ ] signed the mail with gpg Best, Tomaz > > -- > Jonathan Steel >
