On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 14:11 +0000, lawl via aur-general wrote: > The license is very clear. I am not going to debate with everyone if any > individual patch is acceptable or not. > > I expect the ArchLinux project will comply with the license and I'm > unsubscribing again from this mailing list since there is nothing to discuss. > > You have been notified.
The Arch Linux project does not distribute your software. We host a repository of user contributed build scripts, we do not distribute source code or any kind of binary build from your software. The AUR *is not* "distributing packages", it is distributing build scripts. The only thing we host is this git repo: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/?h=noisetorch For the sake of avoiding conflict, I think it would be best for the AUR maintainer for this build script to add a notice on the final software describing the modifications (it could simply point to the PKGBUILD). Though, I would like to point out that there is absolutely no basis for demanding the name to be changed. Several people tried to have a reasonable discussion with you, to no avail, so my reply here lacks most of the courtesy I would have otherwise given and is purely technical. Filipe Laíns
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
