The license is very clear. I am not going to debate with everyone if any individual patch is acceptable or not.
I expect the ArchLinux project will comply with the license and I'm unsubscribing again from this mailing list since there is nothing to discuss. You have been notified. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, May 17, 2021 3:39 PM, Doug Newgard <scim...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:32:26 +0000 > lawl via aur-general aur-general@lists.archlinux.org wrote: > > > Hello > > I'm the developer of NoiseTorch (https://github.com/lawl/NoiseTorch/). > > I faithfully believe that the package "noisetorch" in the ArchLinux User > > Repository ("AUR") (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/noisetorch/) > > violates my license (GPLv3). > > I have the asked previous maintainer of this package to not apply patches > > or make it clear that this is a fork that's being conveyed. Several Arch > > Linux trusted users were also informed of this: > > https://github.com/lawl/NoiseTorch/issues/2#issuecomment-785262068 > > The "patches" you're talking about are those to apply the correct version for > packaging? There's no way any reasonable person would find that violates the > licensing.
