On 17/08/2019 14:15, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 11:30 +0200, Ike Devolder via aur-general wrote: >> On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote: >>> @Ike, >>> >>> I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what >>> seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps >>> it might make sense to change the pkgname? >> >> kodi-bin was chosen to have kodi-x11 as the default, if all "bin" >> packages provide kodi-bin and kodi depends on "kodi-bin", by default >> there would be kodi-gdbm installed, which most people can't actually > What do you think about kodi-default-x11? Same hack, but looks prettier > ☺ >
I think I'll keep it like it is right now. The reason it is like this is sufficient to keep it like this. When a new major version of kodi is on its way I'll reconsider if some changes are needed. >> use. So by having kodi-bin as an actual package which holds kodi-x11 >> that is still most used, users of kodi-wayland or kodi-gdbm can install >> those alongside or alone to suit there needs. >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
