On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:54:09 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/12/19 2:48 PM, Paul Finkelshteyn wrote: > > Of course my comment in there! Here it is: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kodi-devel-bin#comment-703544 > > Ugh, I'm sorry and I completely apologize. I totally misread that > comment and may have only registered the first half. > > Maybe you could provide a bit more explanation, highlight what I said > here about kodi-devel-bin vs kodi-bin-devel? Then we can wait for the > maintainer to respond (it's only been three days, so he might not have > noticed yet), and play it by ear from there. > Thank you for idea on better explaining my point! Here is the comment: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kodi-devel/#comment-703972 I don't really think that it will change anything but on the other hand I'm not absolutely sure that this naming will harm — hardly lots of users have time to compile such a big package more or less usually. For me it was just a matter of interest Paul
pgpyokrJltpUH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
