> I don't see the relevance to the point this seemed to be a response to. > That package may be hard/impossible to maintain, true - but separate > flags for 'out of date', 'broken', 'wont compile' wouldn't aid that > situation any. In fact they might make it worse. Agreed
> If one flag just signifies that something is wrong that requires the > maintainer's attention, it should be easier for users and for > maintainers. Yes, don't get hung up on a name. That button could just as easily have said: "Needs attention" and then it would cover all the bases. -- Evert Vorster Chief Observer WG Cook
