On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Martti Kühne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, D. Can Celasun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This seems reasonable. One question: What user should the automatic > comment > > belong to? Is there something like a pseudo user? > > The best choice would be the maintainer of the package that is being > renamed. It's also the guy to be held responsible for such a request. > Other than that -1 on "parsing every PKGBUILD that has the package in > deps/makedeps and updating them" because it will cause automagic > breakage. > > regards > mar77i > Again, seems reasonable. I'll post an updated patch today.
