On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, D. Can Celasun <[email protected]> wrote: >> This seems reasonable. One question: What user should the automatic comment > belong to? Is there something like a pseudo user?
The best choice would be the maintainer of the package that is being renamed. It's also the guy to be held responsible for such a request. Other than that -1 on "parsing every PKGBUILD that has the package in deps/makedeps and updating them" because it will cause automagic breakage. regards mar77i
